the high price of oil has nothing to do with the invasion...
Ive read both arguments and i am finding sympathetic leanings towards each. I am a full blooded republican, but i am having issues with the invasion based on the sole reason of "weapons of mass destruction". I think i would have felt much better behind the whole case if the Bush team would have just said "He could have weaps, he could have gas, but he is just big zit that needs to be popped" and i would have been behind it 100%.