Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rating: 5
Page 3 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 17 18
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I don't think the Liberal Media is to blame for the censorship of these pictures. It is the conservatives that got the US into this mess. Any pictures like that would benefit the liberal party. The conservative party are the one that wants to take away your rights not the liberals. (ie The Patriot Act) You have been brainwashed by Bush & company so much that you will blame the liberals for anything. I dont understand people who blindly support a party because of it party name and not its policy's. If the liberals were in office right now im sure you would be ranting how horrible of job they have done. You repubs. wanted to impeach Clinton for a BJ, but its perfectly fine to lye about a war and spend billions? Get a clue.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
I agree with ya that what those tools did was way over the line, and I was amazed that their religious leaders said that it was immoral. I think the only way to get those people to calm down is to drop a MOAB in a field on the outskirts of town, and then tell them that the next one is on their head if they don't stop it.
I think the best solution is to publicly state that they should cooperate, 100%, let us fix their shit (we're committed to doing it anyway at this point), leave, and then they can kill each other in a lovely civil war. The sooner they cooperate, the sooner we can leave, and the sooner they can bum rush one anothers dung hovels and wack each other in the name of their peacefull religion.
The only problem is that "pop the american" is almost becoming a sport there, and this whole episode may embolden them. There's 33 million of them, and we have 140k (approx) troops. If they picked up simply cutlery and rushed, we'ld run out of bullets before we could stop em.




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
Zen Flamer
***
Offline
Zen Flamer
***
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
The starving of 150004504 people doesn't fall into our hands. Maybe you don't remember the stupidest plan in the world called "Oil for Food"? it just turned into a slush fund for the ruling party (i.e. Saddam) so don't say USA starved the good people of Iraq, it was they greedy ass dictator.
Starvation line for Iraq holds as much water as the reparation claims by Al Sharptin and the rest of the rainbow coalition.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
Zen Flamer
***
Offline
Zen Flamer
***
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
I agree we shouldn't have gone into Iraq, but I also see it as an effective bullying technique, Qadafi has now opened his arms to the westerners, knowing he wants to enjoy his lavish plunderings in peace and not be overthrown like Saddam.
I would have to say institutionalizing any government in a foreign country is "almost" guaranteed to fail.
But to be honest, I wouldn't even want to touch Africa because it is soooo fucked up its not even fucking, that place was fucked up ever since it was colonized, and still to this day it is messed up with forced borders that do not put into account tribes wishes.
I have half my family is South Africa, and the shit there is not even as bad as the rest of Africa, but it is still scary as all get out. <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Khadafi was in the process of giving up his WMD due to the pan am incident and isolation. The administration jumped on it to claim some form of success (which almost derailed the whole thing). It was EU negotiators who worked it out with Libia well before the whole Iraq thing.




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
[LoD]Khell #142279 04/03/04 08:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
they should have had the Mossad cap his ass, let civil war break out, then get the UN security council to pass a vote to save em. Then we'ld have Saudis, Pakistanis and other Islamic nations doing peace keeping. That would appease the population, and we could focus on true terrorism (Abu Sayef etc...) and not subject the armed forces to a seemingly unsolvable task.
I'm neither republican or democrat, I take each individual on their merits. Generally I hate all politicians due to their special interests and personal whims. Mandela, Thatcher and Ghandi were politicians I respect. All for different reasons.
Though I do love Powells back peddling in the last 24 hrs. Shits getting deep and they're backing away from the pool!




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
We gave them food... Saddam stole that food for his own financial gain. Those figures are totally inccorrect about "us starving them to death"... 8/

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
[
Lord of Fumes
**
Offline
Lord of Fumes
**
[
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
Needs to be hunted down and killed.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
[
Lord of Fumes
**
Offline
Lord of Fumes
**
[
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
I wouldn't take burned bodies and poke them with fucking sticks.
These people are worthless if thats the kind of value they place on human life. Fuck em all.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
[
Lord of Fumes
**
Offline
Lord of Fumes
**
[
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
Could be wrong, but im prety sure thats true.

Page 3 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 17 18

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 35 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 35 (0.007s) Memory: 11.6800 MB (Peak: 12.8755 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-05-03 11:09:14 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS