|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yeah, of course we will. You see the U.S actually losing a war in the 21st century? The most dominant force to ever exist in this world...? That's actually rather laughable. We became dominant in 200 year's, and every other country that has ever existed has never had our values of freedom/power. Pretty much every country that exists today has been around for 1,000's of year's. Especially the one's in eruope/middle east. We passed every country up in 200 years? Pfft.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The whole world besides the U.S seems to be brainwashed. It's pretty pathetic in my opinion. Sadly even some U.S citizens who are as well. Everyone of these people need to fucking wake up, and get a clue what were up against. They act as if it's the 90's.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I don't look up every detail of a situation unlike you just did son. I know everything you just said. I just don't bother to remember every simple detail of a situation. I know what happened in clear point of view. No I don't base my entire life around this shit to know every detail, but I do know the main points of it. I also have the logical understanding of the whole point as well. I can care less if I don't recall a specific tiny detail that happened year's ago son. Did I say we should have gone in and destroy Afghanistan? No... If we went into afghanistan to obtain them the percent ratio of actually killing/captureing Osama, and any other high ranking member's would have been significant compared to throwing a dart at a fly. If afghanistan got in our way at trying to dismember a terrorist organization then they shall be destroyed as well. Just like they tryed to in 2001. I commend Clinton for actually "attempting" it, even though it was a piss poor attempt. So much more could have been done throughout the 90's, but a shitty president was in office. That's what happens I suppose.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hey son if you'd take the time to go to the URL you'll see that I didn't type that... gg stretch It's clearly stating what I said about the clinton adminstration. They were all talk, and no action. They did nothing. Please go through the whole post next time 8D
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I do think the sooner would be best, but I'm saying that I wouldn't care if it took longer. 8D
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You ever think that's how the majority are? It sure does seem like it to me. The "extremist" smart one's don't go on for a reason probably, because their values would be smashed repeatedly. So the idiots (which is a majority of left wingers) take the bashings. I'm still not convinced that there are "smart" one's left now day's.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,642
Adept
|
Adept
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,642 |
I couldnt agree more stretch. I think Clinton is an awsome president. To tell you the truth if Hillary and Clinton divorced, and Monica was the first lady. I would vote Clinton over bush. I would say that Clinton is not only a good president but will probably be remembered as one of the best public speaking presidents we ever had. I have nothing bad to say about Clinton, I do admit to using the "what about the 2 embassy bombings and USS cole bombing when they try to say that Bush could have prevented the 9/11 attacks." I do agree with you 100% though. I really hate partisan gossip and using democrats as examples to back up my opinions. hehe, I would be lying if i said i never did it. I am definately guilty of it. =-) Talking on the political boards and talking to some of you LoD interested in politics is seriously helping me understand a lot more. On the political boards that i chat on I had to tone it down because sometimes i really didnt see the big picture and i realized I should do more research and less giberish. Werd =-) Faust , you may be at the pride stage atm. You gotta sit back and realize the big picture. Using Clinton as a scape goat isnt the way to go about it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
Zen Flamer
|
Zen Flamer
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155
Zen Flamer
|
Zen Flamer
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,155 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,429
LoD Groupie w/ privileges
|
LoD Groupie w/ privileges
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,429 |
every time it is a choosing a lesser of two evils. Why can't we have a person that is more moderate, with slightly more fiscally conservative views, that is for pr choice and shit? It's just sick to see how bad this country is getting partisan wise. My representative is a republican, but I voted for him, because he does a good job. If he tried to get into the game now, and was not an incumbanent, there is no way that the republican party would endorse him because he isn't extreme enough. This also holds true for the democrats. Thank god that Dean isn't getting the endorsement. God damn we needed someone like Clark tho.
|
|
|
0 members (),
35
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|