I'ld have to say we're all pretty much in agreement he/she is no conservative! I don't think I would classify him as anything other than a "fucktard". The use of "conservative" and "liberal" as wastebaskets to lump undesirables is all too convenient, shortly followed by a mass generalization of the group.
It's like Panemon, he hates his country (the USA), he hates everyone in it, sells illegal drugs to 13 year old kids, hates the president, hates his parents, hates everything. There is no way you could even think of calling the guy a conservative. He has no moral compass at all. But I don't think you could call him a liberal either, as they have differing morals/beliefs than conservatives, but they still have morlas/beliefs, they draw a line, albiet in a different location, and perhaps direction. Again, Pan I would group as a "fucktard".
The generalization of liberals as chaotic mindless spineless lunatics with no moral compass is as incorrect as the generalization of conservatives as religious zealots who are cruel to cuddly animals and utterly out of their minds as they march KKK style clutching UZI's.
The lumping of chaotic mindless spineless lunatics as liberals, is as incorrect as lumping religious zealots who are cruel to cuddly animals and utterly out of their minds as they march KKK style clutching UZI's as conservatives.
There are some people who fit in neither group. That lady who butchered her own kids is closer to being a conservative than a liberal, but I wouldn't use that isolated event as a catch all condemnation of all conservatives. Frankly, I'ld sooner lump under the "fucktard" heading, not as a conservative, or as a liberal.
The polarized generalizations of both groups are mind numbing, kind of reminds me of a religious battle, where both sides are sooooo right, that they are utterly wrong.
