I wouldn't put faith into it as an unnamed source, jsut like I put no faith into the "nigeria uranium" claim, the WMD launch in 45 minutes", "15,000 tons of VX" or the "Al Queda - Iraq" link that were all peddled as "legitimate" sources. Oddly our conservative compatriots defended these claims with all they could.
Anyone should question an unnamed source.
I am glad to see the conservatives question something, I just wish they wouldn't be so selective on blind obedience, and questioning. They are very selective on which "unnamed sources" are to be believed 100% and which to be believe 0%. Oddly those decisions fall on party lines, coincidence?
If the man is that out of it, I would suspect that it would have gotten leaked and be out in the open sooner. That is too over the top behaviourwise to stay under wraps this long. It would have leaked in one of the many anti-bush books by now.
I say Greenspan for Prez '04. If not him, then Mr. T.
