Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,283
The Shit
**
Offline
The Shit
**
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,283
book? jc

Jobu #154187 06/24/04 06:29 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
It has nothing to do with Bush or his doctrine. I understand you would credit a balmy sunny perfect day on the Bush doctrine.
The Saudi royal family does not want to be toppled. They estimate 500 to 35,000 al queda operatives in Saudi. In other words, they have no damn clue how many there are, and a lot of common folk are cheering on the terrorists. They're scared, and they should be, they are a target of the radicals bigtime.
Again, it has as much to do with Bush as Libia giving up their WMD program did (that was 0% Bush, again on that you were beating the Republican drum claiming your "all star administration" (as you put it) was responsible).
Quick!!!! The sugar crop is great in Indonesia...you should credit the Bush doctrine for it!




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
This is a minor escalation in relation to some of the shit going on there. I hope the Saudi's kill every fucking terrorist in their country.




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
Mujahedeen #154189 06/24/04 06:46 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
[
Lord of Fumes
**
Offline
Lord of Fumes
**
[
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
"Amercia for one is not powerful enough to invade S.A"
Where the hell do you get this idea?

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
That shit would have happened if Bush was never in office to begin with correct? I highly doubt it.

#154192 06/24/04 09:10 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
We can destroy any country if we wanted too. Which Muj is completly wrong about.
We could also occupy any country if we wanted to. Perhaps we can't occupy any country because of our standards. But if we threw the rule book out, and it did not matter to our country that we do so. We could occupy and destroy any country if we pleased. But going about it that way isn't what were about.
You may be right that we "might" not be able to occupy a country going by the rule book, but were the only country that "might" be able to do it. That's for sure.
The U.S is the worlds babysitter. We give and give, but yet we don't get any thanks for it.

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
This has nothing to do with the elections.

#154194 06/24/04 10:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
[
Lord of Fumes
**
Offline
Lord of Fumes
**
[
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,626
Thats not what he said though =P.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,176
Founder - Orc Pimp
***
Offline
Founder - Orc Pimp
***
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,176
NT

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,176
Founder - Orc Pimp
***
Offline
Founder - Orc Pimp
***
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,176
Any country that wants to get rid of religious radicals is OK in my book (even if that's not what its really about).
-Bal.

Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 35 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 36 (0.005s) Memory: 11.8181 MB (Peak: 18.3393 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-06-21 20:51:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS