Lords of Death Forums Lords of Death Forums LoD General Discussion Saudi Arabia about to get ugly

You're obviously to stupid to read what I said? "IF we used measures that isn't by the rulebook we could destroy/occupy any country if we wanted too". Do you not understand what that means, or did they refuse your request to get on the shot bus during life? Please do tell...
I should be the one laughing... Torak can't be more right about you. Please son get some sense. I'm really serious about this.
P.S
Name one war your country has won? Oh yeah I forgot Canada has no military... ktybye

and a lot more should be over thrown as well. Do you let criminals do what they want? Why should you with governments?
Conflicts will continue to exist as long as a country isn't a democracy. Unless the country was put in place and know where they belong if they don't wanna lose it. Cubas a good example.

I have no problems with you stating your opinions on our forums. We have very few rules (no racism, threats, LoD impersonations or gay porn unless its 2 hot chicks) that even Panemon seems to manage to abide by.
However, that last poster seemed to think that you represented LoD in some fashion, and I just wanted to point out that you DO NOT in-fact represent LoD. It has nothing to do with whether I agree with your posts or not.
-Bal.

Those two are good examples too. Yet I still don't think wwI or liberating Kuwait was for our selfish interest. Sure you can make points out of it to make it look like that do to what history has made of it, but while it was happening I really doubt we went there for a selfish interest in something. I'm sure you can make even the slightest selfish interest out of anything like this do to history. But I really do doubt 95% or even 99% of what we've done was for selfish needs...

Thank you and ineed, in fact I think the only people who COULD ever rep you are [LOD] members, and even then from my times seeing you play on baja til now even those TRUE members are hush and let you or 1 or 2 other members do the speaking. Much like a well greased goverment.

You then sir have your head in a hole, and its not in the sand. Heard of CSIS ? Centre for Srat Studies. the USA's largest think tank on international affairs and war and its effect. They stated the US relies so much on high cost equipment and tech that in a long drawn out occupiation, or an extended war with a country even 1/2 the size of milltary might but that used low cost machines could bankrupt the US. Now then thats just one statement. The US itself is far away, besides Canada and Mexico from all areas it can attack. Even with aricraft carriers and all other means of transport, if you needed a large base which to have operations you would eventually fall that way.
All I say is I do nto beleive the US could hold power in ANY country [ beside France ] for more then 10 years , take the loses and speand the money they do on the millitary now.
Got any idea Faust how much you've sunk into this so called EASY victory over Iraq. Try a real army and do it yourself sir without the UN.

Truly only spoken from someone who knows no other way of thought. Democacy is the best of the worst, but not the onl TRUE and warless way sir.

Did you know America supplied German Army with weapons and resources. There was a large group of Americans that wanted to side with the germans. Needless to say you entered the War when Japan attacked you unprovoked.
Its not black and white as you see it sir. Then again I bet your the type of American that is so gung ho you could never admit maybe the US is not the Shining Becon of Light it claims to be world wide. Every move it does to help people is not self-motivated, nor is every move done to just "help" people.

There is no way in hell America would've EVER sided with the germans in ww2. You would have to be out of your mind to believe that kind of garbage.

As I stated again read what I said. "We could destroy/occupy any country if we threw the rule book out the window". Please once more do you not understand what that means? You still think that post was about the U.S winning under normal circumstances after I clearly stated it two times already that it wasn't... Here I'll say it again "re-read that post"... It's not that hard to do, and if it's that hard to understand what it meant then I don't know what to say besides you're stupid k?
Btw why would we fight a "real army" as you stated? What idiotic goverment would be stupid enough to welcome that fight? That's quite simple to answer, none... It's not like we'll ever know, because it wouldn't ever happen. You can think all you want that the U.S would lose "under normal circumstances", and I think what I want. Not to mention any common sense person unlike you would think it too, but I suppose you're an exception do to your stupidity. I really don't know...
Yet I continued a conversation that you invented there in that second statement do to your stupidity. I'll state again re-read the start of this whole ordeal, and maybe you'll finally realize what I've said in these last two threads that I've replied to concerning this matter.