Dude,
You said the following:
"Before the flames begin show me what has been proven to be false about any of these articles."
I have proved factual errors in many of these articles. Doesn't that make you concerned about the accuracy of all of the content?
Let's take a real life example. Let's say you are reading a report at work that shows uptime for the servers that you are in charge of. While reviewing it you notice that the percent uptime calculation ignores the 1 hour each night that we shutdown the servers for maintenance. There is no mention in the report that this time has been removed from the downtime calculation and no operating procedure that says it should be ignored. What do you do?
a) Ignore this fact and assume that whoever wrote the report knows what they are doing and it is OK?
b) Investigate the methodolgy that the report author used to to make sure that it will provide accurate reliable results?
c) Review some other sources of information that may provide comparable data so that you can evaluate the reports accuracy?
I assume you would choose B or C or some combination of B or C. Anyone that I am going to hire would.
I thought the purpose of this exercise was to determine if your articles were accurate. Clearly there are some factual errors in them, and I have shown them to you. You can choose to ignore them, or you can do some more investigation and make an educated decision.
If you have already done your research of other sources that is fine. If not then you are the one spewing propoganda not me.
