Perhaps if you didn't try to use various NON related terrorist issues to promote the attack in Iraq.
Saddam was not in league with the terrorists?
#1. harboring Abu Nidal
#2. harboring Abu Abbas
#3. harboring Abdul Rahmn Yasin (1993 WTC bomber)
#4. Paying the families of suicide bombers in Israel/Palestine
#5. Zarqawi being treated in Baghdad for his wounds suffered in Afghanistan and then setting up shop in the city months before the war started in Iraq.
#6. harboring Khala Khadr al-Salahat, Pan Am 103 bomber
#7. Even the 9/11 commission says Iraq had a decade-long list of meetings with Al Qaeda. Whether they eventually cooperated together we don;t know, but we do know they had lost of meetings. I doubt they were discussing crop rotation.
that is what you said. Ok, but that does not give a reason for invasion now does it. Since
1] gave you link to 9/11 commission site, asked for where you got the links you found none.
2] When asked how Iraq had been in bed with AQ , you have mulitple times satted decade long meetings. Where is this info.
3] You then state and this is above right , how PLO , or Arab Relations vs Jew relations have led to bloodshed and war, yes it happens, you through your posts have stated the 9/11 and such attackers also were paying the families of suicide bombers in Israel/Palestine , I don't isreal/palestine .. never seen a jew bomber , tanks and planes dropping missles yes but bombers now.
Anyways, you will throw in any unrelated shit to make a point, or use many people unrelated to prove the need for war.
