He's saying that he will blame Bush and everyone will be sorry for electing him when the Terrorists strike again, and the double standard is, although this may be true, if Kerry was in office, and the same thing happened, he wouldn't be treated the same? That's called a double standard, kthx.
Sort of like people still believe that there was a connection between 9/11 and Iraq.
There is, it's been proven over and over. Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligent services prior to the 9/11 attacks, on top of that Zarqwari is an Al Queada Terrorists from Jordan who is the main man in Iraq. Al Queada + Al Zarqwari + Iraq = connection.
I believe Kerry would kill terrorists as well or better than Bush can.
No one said he wouldn't, but the fact remains, Bush has proven he will do this. But don't you see you're argueing the fact that if we get attacked while Bush is in office, it will be 100% his fault and everyone will hate him. But on the other hand you're argueing that if Kerry was in office and the same thing happened, that the american ppl wouldn't blame him, in fact the liberals are so narrow minded , even if Kerry was in office and we got attacked, they'd still blame Bush. Just get over it, we won, stop crying.
