Dude...in that entire wall of opinionated text you still didn't link one credible source to back up what you said.
I'm making a UO PK vid right now so I don't have time to go point for point on you but for starters, how do you even know if the energy used to produce solar panels or other forms of "clean" power is worth it? By worth it, I mean a simple matter of math. How long would that piece of equipment have to be in place in order to recoup the money and energy that was used to create it? Solar panels don't come out of thin air. Metal has to be mined, smelted and formed. Glass has to be made. Workers in plant using machines have to assemble the panels, etc. How do you know these sources of clean energy are viable on a large scale? How many cities could your turbine idea support? What I see is a bunch of stoner garble completely unsupported my any hard data at all.
Secondly, you still missed the point of waste management Fly. There will be a point in the future, based on today's technology, whatever that point is in terms of number of human beings on the planet, when we produce refuse and waste faster than it can decompose/be buried/be cleaned (sewage), etc. So the REAL hope is that we can develop technology to speed that process up or neutralize waste faster/better before we reach that point of critical mass.
I'm kinda done arguing this point with you. The very notion that our planet can support an unlimited number of human beings is sheer fantasy. Find me one scholarly journal or trusted scientific source that supports this absurd notion, please. I guarantee you that you cannot because your premise makes no logical sense whatsoever.
