I was playing loadout until 3:00~ something AM - which is my typical log out time (everyone knows this) but then I saw Vermi backed himself out after I called his shit a bunch of conspiracy bullshit used against any/all nations peoples to establish powers over them.
I then decided 'ok I'll play their game & I will use Vermi's references against him..'
Vermi posted 2 articles on "OVERPOPULATION" - where if one actually took the time to each article, you would have found each one contradicted the other article's facts & biases for their arguments. The only point that was actually the same in both of these articles is that
"at 'x' population point at 'x' year, the human population will not be able to sustain itself for 'x' reason"
All 'credible' sources.. If you want to call them that... stop for a second here; remember anyone that is PAID to have an opinion on a matter should be completely discounted.. if Gfist cant use Fox news as his source of 'facts' because they are obviously biased.. what makes it ok for the other side to do it aswell.. another argument on debates for later.. Anyways
- All credible sources in Vermi's articles had different numbers, stats, base line 'facts', etc. that lead them to their opinion that OVERPOPULATION is an actual possibility that will happen. None of his 'experts' actually agree on anything other than the "OVERPOPULATION" part & that it will eventually happen at some point or another.
In fact when you really get into Vermi's articles they even break down previous sources of this same bullshit.. Referencing another 'credible' scientist from the 70s with his own set of numbers, facts, bullshit, that have him saying this stuff.. & it goes all the way back to another in the late 1700s with his own set of numbers, facts, bullshit, that have him saying this stuff.. etc.
In Vermi's articles I count no less than 5 'experts' on the subject matter.. NONE of the experts numbers, figures, data, whatever, actually match up with one another.. they all just use whatever it is they have available during their timeframe to make their argument for OVERPOPULATION.
Things I absolutely loved about Vermi's articles..
First, is that one of these 'experts' - Population Biologist Joel Cohen of Columbia University goes on to state "In truth, no one knows when or at what level peak population will be reached" Cohen told Life's Little Mysteries. Of all of the 'experts' he is the only one that makes sense. Yet all the other 'experts' each have their own 'it will happen in 'x' year'.. 'it will happen at 'x' population level'.. 'it will happen for 'x' reason' - Yet Joel Cohen seems to actually get it..
See the 'expert' from the 1970's wouldn't get a concept like ; all of mankind eventually moving away from solid foods & we would all be on a 'super slushy nutrient filled milk shake diet' (or an IV.. or a pill.. etc.) packed with everything we need to survive/thrive. See the guy from the 1970s wouldn't understand that the tech would carry us so far to the point that we wouldn't need solid foods to sustain our populations as he imagines us needing all of this land for farming/live stock.
Next, I like the article from 1992 as it actually had the most FACTS in it.. but really those 'FACTS' were not 'FACTS' at all.. just projections of numbers/statistics based off the BABY BOOM GENERATIONS. Now for the cool part here.. the guy from the 1970s uses the baby boom generation to get his numbers/stats to make his argument.. the guy from the 1990s also uses the baby boom generation to get his numbers/stats to make his argument.. but their numbers, facts, figures, do not match up at all. The reason being that 20 years later A LOT HAS CHANGED.. which you can then easily see during the jump from the 1992 article to the 2011 article.. 20 years later A LOT HAS CHANGED..
I mean consider this for a moment.. the guy talking out his as in 1992 using his bullshit facts/figures.. Imagine you could go back in time & you tried to sit down with him back in 1992 just to attempt to explain to him the world wide web. I will tell you a guy that wants you to kill your baby will likely get out the burning pitch forks for attempting to explain blasphemy such as the world wide web.. seriously consider that the concept of the internet would be out of that guys grasp at the time of his article. This expert would have no idea the level of tech boom that was about to happen in his next 20 years..
Just the same.. look at us after the past 20 years.. Do you really think that in 20 years from now this dumb bitch & her article from 2011 is going to carry any weight/validity? Bro your cellphone has more tech in it than NASA had when putting man on the moon. Do you see where I am going with this?
NO, please.. take some 'experts' word that we couldn't possibly find a way to feed ourselves.. a means of getting rid of our wastes.. etc. feeble minded creatures
Another part I loved about Vermi's articles is that.. the ONLY solution these 'experts' offer is - kill your baby.. straight up that's their solution.. & I should note that their solution is YOU KILL YOUR BABY (AS I WILL MOST DEFINATELY NOT BE KILLING MINE) - I love that.. because you know people that support this kind of thought process.. the Bushs, McCains, Obamas, Clintons, Kennedys, etc. WILL MOST DEFINATELY NOT BE KILLING OFF THIER NEXT GENERATIONS (THEIR DYNASTIC PLAN FOR THEIR FAMILY IS TO CONVINCE YOUR DUMBASS INTO KILLING OFF YOUR BLOODLINE.. GOD JOB BUDDY DO IT)
Now as I can easily prove, (do I really need to copy/paste links for this?) If you continue down the line of history.. I even reference several other examples of this same bullshit. Yes Hitler did this same thing to his people.. Stalin did the same thing to his.. the Chinese are doing it RIGHT THE FUCK NOW..
& again go back throughout all of history tell me that
The British Empire didn't use this on their subjects.. The Romans didn't do it to their republic.. The Japanese Empire didn't do it to their peoples.. etc. etc. etc.
Its been the same shit for literally 3000+ years & its always been a power play to get at peoples food, water, etc. - You can play to get a nations wealth to control its population.. or you can play to get a nations food, water, PEOPLE, etc. to control its population. Either way its to have control over people. If you cannot see that & you want to believe in some Harvard jackass go ahead bro
Again if you didn't know.. Harvard has been at the heart of WWIII started in 1954 with the rest of their like minded scum that is currently moving the world in the direction their NWO.. these guys have a "DYNASTY PLAN" that may take them 200+ years but they will "take over ze world" - As much as I or anyone else tries to fight it.. the Vermi's & Firaxis's & even the Sonya's that are just too caught up in the day to day to see it coming.. its just not going to be enough & they will 'win'
Quote it - I give most of the world about 5 generations at best before our Families are enslaved by them.. just watch what happens over the next 2-3 generations to Western Europe.. we lost the crusades because we haven't been fighting them but our enemies have.
