Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Adept
**
Offline
Adept
**
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Wow.....law enforcement just don't know when to quit. I'm glad this fuckhead wrote this article though. All he's done is help spread awareness about how fucked up the attitude of some cops are. He really picked a bad time to do this.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/20/us/ferguson-column-police-reaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,273
[
Adept
**
Offline
Adept
**
[
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,273
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Vermithrax]Wow.....law enforcement just don't know when to quit. I'm glad this fuckhead wrote this article though. All he's done is help spread awareness about how fucked up the attitude of some cops are. He really picked a bad time to do this.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/20/us/ferguson-column-police-reaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1


What is wrong with anything this guy said?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,334
Adept
***
Offline
Adept
***
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,334
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Vermithrax]Wow.....law enforcement just don't know when to quit. I'm glad this fuckhead wrote this article though. All he's done is help spread awareness about how fucked up the attitude of some cops are. He really picked a bad time to do this.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/20/us/ferguson-column-police-reaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1


He actually made great points.

If people only realized the opposite side of the coin, from a LEO's perspective of dealing with people at their lowest day in and day out, how ridiculous that is for other human beings (cops are human too) to take on a daily basis, they might understand that cooperation is the smartest thing any civilian can do when you are targeted by the police. Of course there are a lot of retards who are in law enforcement, that's just the human population, we are flawed, some more than others. There are bad apples in every sector of employment throughout the world, everywhere.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,195
[
Initiate
*
Offline
Initiate
*
[
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,195
I haven't seen the police in Ferguson use anything I can't purchase as a citizen. Just need the $$$$. I would rather get tear gas launched at me instead of beat in the face with a nightstick like the old days.

APC.
http://www.intlrepo-depo.com/vehicles_for_sale_2.htm

Tear Gas.
http://www.keepshooting.com/clear-out-6oz-tear-gas-grenade.html

Rubber ammo.
http://www.ammunitiontogo.com/index.php/cName/less-lethal-ammo-12-gauge-ammo

Class 3 Body Armor:
http://www.bulletsafe.com/bullet-proof-vest.html

12ga flares:
http://www.firequest.com/G12-014.html

Ballistic Shields:
http://www.galls.com/protech-intruder-g2-20x34-iiia-ballistic-shield

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Adept
**
Offline
Adept
**
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Godsmak]
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Vermithrax]Wow.....law enforcement just don't know when to quit. I'm glad this fuckhead wrote this article though. All he's done is help spread awareness about how fucked up the attitude of some cops are. He really picked a bad time to do this.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/20/us/ferguson-column-police-reaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1


He actually made great points.

If people only realized the opposite side of the coin, from a LEO's perspective of dealing with people at their lowest day in and day out, how ridiculous that is for other human beings (cops are human too) to take on a daily basis, they might understand that cooperation is the smartest thing any civilian can do when you are targeted by the police. Of course there are a lot of retards who are in law enforcement, that's just the human population, we are flawed, some more than others. There are bad apples in every sector of employment throughout the world, everywhere.


I agree with most of what you said. My problem with it is, the rest of the bad apples don't have guns, tasers and pepper spray and if you piss them off at their job, you're not in fear of them using those tools on you.

I'm working on a response to Sonya.




Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Adept
**
Offline
Adept
**
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Well first things first, while looking for vids, I found this one. Dude, tell me this is not fucking Kenny Powers driving this car??? Voice is spot on. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o)

In response to your question, where to begin?

In light of what's going in MO? Everything. What a fucking dumbass. Do you really think it's wise for a cop to write, "...here is the bottom line: if you don't want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you,"? Considering everything that's going on down there and the hostility between police and civilians and the underlying racial tension, do you really believe this was an appropriate time to make these kinds of comments?

Outside of the poor timing, there's many other reasons what he said is wrong.

From the LAPD's website: "To Protect and to Serve" became the official motto of the Police Academy, and it was kept constantly before the officers in training as the aim and purpose of their profession. I want you to tell me how "Do what I tell you or I'm going to physically hurt you" jives with that motto?

There are of course situations when his statements would make sense. Picking one out of millions of possible situations, if he locates a guy dressed in all black running out of a parking lot after a burglar alarm goes off. Yea, in that case, the guy should probably do exactly as he's told. Or a DV call. It's widely known how dangerous DV calls are for officers. People are already angry and out of control when the police show up. In that situation, I'd expect an officer to more aggressive about asserting his authority with a person who is already irate and unpredictable.

However, there's also situations where the cops make unreasonable and sometimes unlawful demands for which they have no authority or legal backing. You can find a plethora of videos on youtube of cops ordering civilians to stop filming them. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izyC_TaVh8M )That's not a lawful order and you of all people can back me up on that. Unless I'm interfering with an investigation (subjective of course), I have the right to film police when they're on duty. Should I expect then, based on this officers article, that if a cop gives me an unlawful command to stop filming him that I'm going to be physically hurt if I refuse to obey it? Outside of youtube videos Sonya, I've had police order me to stop filming them before, during a friend's DUI stop. I refused. They backed down because they knew they had no grounds to prevent me from doing so.

What about other times when they unlawfully demand ID when they have no reasonable suspicion to believe someone has committed or is about to commit a crime? If I refuse to show ID, should I be worried I'm going to get hurt? How about this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o )? 20 minutes of these cops fucking with this guy and trying to get his ID because he was walking down the street and allegedly "fit a description". The guy obviously knows EXACTLY how reasonable suspicion works. Why did they continue to fuck with him? They point a gun at him and a pull out a taser in a threatening way. And for what? Dude was minding his business walking down the street. This kind of shit just shouldn't fucking happen. If the dude was white and in Granite Bay or Irvine, you know he wouldn't be dealing with this shit. But because he's Mexican (it sounds like), he's getting fucked with for no reason.

In this vid ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytb2OF7U1IU ), cop tries to coerce the guy into answering his questions at a DUI stop. He tells him he HAS to answer them because he came through the checkpoint. You and I both know the driver has zero obligation to answer any questions under any circumstances, but the cops lie and say he does. Cop even goes as far as to say "...when you pull this kind of crap." So now asserting your 5th amendment right not to answer questions to police is "pulling crap"? When did it become a bad thing to stand up an assert the rights that our constitution guarantees you?

Cops are not always right Sonya. You're a really smart guy and it took you years of education and experience to understand the law. Most cops I've met aren't at your level of intelligence and certainly don't have your training. But the author of that article is basically saying that in the moment, the cop is always right and you better do what you're told if you don't want to suffer physical harm and you can file a complaint later. Considering cops do sometimes blatantly lie (it's a felony for you to record me!) and misinform people about what their rights are and do sometimes blatantly misconstrue what questions/commands people are required to answer/obey, I think saying "do what I say or you're going to get hurt" is a slippery fucking slope. It's also generally a poor fucking attitude for someone who's job is SUPPOSED to be protecting and serving his community.

I know this will not change your mind. We've been over this and your overall view about these kinda of things is just fundamentally and irreconcilably different than mine. Based on your previous posts, I'd imagine you're going to take the position that the guy in the 20 min vid should have just cooperated and shown his ID and then he could have been on his way. Because he was uncooperative, they thought he was the guy, blah blah. I disagree entirely. I think if I'm walking down the street minding my own business, I should be left the fuck alone. I don't give a shit if they're looking for someone who "looks like me". That's subjective bullshit and it's not my fucking problem.




Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,811
The Angry Mythbuster
**
Offline
The Angry Mythbuster
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,811
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Vermithrax]Well first things first, while looking for vids, I found this one. Dude, tell me this is not fucking Kenny Powers driving this car??? Voice is spot on. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o)

In response to your question, where to begin?

In light of what's going in MO? Everything. What a fucking dumbass. Do you really think it's wise for a cop to write, "...here is the bottom line: if you don't want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you,"? Considering everything that's going on down there and the hostility between police and civilians and the underlying racial tension, do you really believe this was an appropriate time to make these kinds of comments?

Outside of the poor timing, there's many other reasons what he said is wrong.

From the LAPD's website: "To Protect and to Serve" became the official motto of the Police Academy, and it was kept constantly before the officers in training as the aim and purpose of their profession. I want you to tell me how "Do what I tell you or I'm going to physically hurt you" jives with that motto?

There are of course situations when his statements would make sense. Picking one out of millions of possible situations, if he locates a guy dressed in all black running out of a parking lot after a burglar alarm goes off. Yea, in that case, the guy should probably do exactly as he's told. Or a DV call. It's widely known how dangerous DV calls are for officers. People are already angry and out of control when the police show up. In that situation, I'd expect an officer to more aggressive about asserting his authority with a person who is already irate and unpredictable.

However, there's also situations where the cops make unreasonable and sometimes unlawful demands for which they have no authority or legal backing. You can find a plethora of videos on youtube of cops ordering civilians to stop filming them. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izyC_TaVh8M )That's not a lawful order and you of all people can back me up on that. Unless I'm interfering with an investigation (subjective of course), I have the right to film police when they're on duty. Should I expect then, based on this officers article, that if a cop gives me an unlawful command to stop filming him that I'm going to be physically hurt if I refuse to obey it? Outside of youtube videos Sonya, I've had police order me to stop filming them before, during a friend's DUI stop. I refused. They backed down because they knew they had no grounds to prevent me from doing so.

What about other times when they unlawfully demand ID when they have no reasonable suspicion to believe someone has committed or is about to commit a crime? If I refuse to show ID, should I be worried I'm going to get hurt? How about this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o )? 20 minutes of these cops fucking with this guy and trying to get his ID because he was walking down the street and allegedly "fit a description". The guy obviously knows EXACTLY how reasonable suspicion works. Why did they continue to fuck with him? They point a gun at him and a pull out a taser in a threatening way. And for what? Dude was minding his business walking down the street. This kind of shit just shouldn't fucking happen. If the dude was white and in Granite Bay or Irvine, you know he wouldn't be dealing with this shit. But because he's Mexican (it sounds like), he's getting fucked with for no reason.

In this vid ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytb2OF7U1IU ), cop tries to coerce the guy into answering his questions at a DUI stop. He tells him he HAS to answer them because he came through the checkpoint. You and I both know the driver has zero obligation to answer any questions under any circumstances, but the cops lie and say he does. Cop even goes as far as to say "...when you pull this kind of crap." So now asserting your 5th amendment right not to answer questions to police is "pulling crap"? When did it become a bad thing to stand up an assert the rights that our constitution guarantees you?

Cops are not always right Sonya. You're a really smart guy and it took you years of education and experience to understand the law. Most cops I've met aren't at your level of intelligence and certainly don't have your training. But the author of that article is basically saying that in the moment, the cop is always right and you better do what you're told if you don't want to suffer physical harm and you can file a complaint later. Considering cops do sometimes blatantly lie (it's a felony for you to record me!) and misinform people about what their rights are and do sometimes blatantly misconstrue what questions/commands people are required to answer/obey, I think saying "do what I say or you're going to get hurt" is a slippery fucking slope. It's also generally a poor fucking attitude for someone who's job is SUPPOSED to be protecting and serving his community.

I know this will not change your mind. We've been over this and your overall view about these kinda of things is just fundamentally and irreconcilably different than mine. Based on your previous posts, I'd imagine you're going to take the position that the guy in the 20 min vid should have just cooperated and shown his ID and then he could have been on his way. Because he was uncooperative, they thought he was the guy, blah blah. I disagree entirely. I think if I'm walking down the street minding my own business, I should be left the fuck alone. I don't give a shit if they're looking for someone who "looks like me". That's subjective bullshit and it's not my fucking problem.






You do know that Cops are legally allowed to lie, right? Knowing your rights is your responsibility. If you aren't smart enough to know what requests the police are legally allowed to make, then maybe you aren't smart enough to talk back to the police.

The first video you put up shows the guy willfully staying and talking to the police after they say he is not detained. When they say you are not detained you walk away and you don't stop to talk to them again. If they want to stop you they put handcuffs on you. It's obvious this guy wanted to "prove" he knew his rights. If he kept walking and the cops detained him on video he would be rolling in Six Figure Settlement Money. His dumbass stopped to chat. It wasn't the cops who detained him, he detained himself. This is the number one mistake I see on youtube videos with dorks pretending their rights were violated.

When a cop says STOP, you stop. When a cop says "Excuse me Sir", you do whatever the fuck you please.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425
G
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
Offline
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
G
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425
Cops are not god, they are simply put in place to enforce laws, time and time again they have been proven to be incompetent of the laws they are supposed to be enforcing. This is a training issue, nothing else; see ferguson.

A badge and gun does not give extra rights and privileges, the same way my military status overseas didn't give me free leeway to smoke motherfuckers without repercussions.. Or as I saw fit. Who knows the details of the actual shooting at this point, but Ferguson looks like an iraqi town that we had good intel on back in 2008.. If you're okay with that and have no idea why people like me have a problem with that; so be it.


Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Adept
**
Offline
Adept
**
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,917
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Rainman]
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Vermithrax]Well first things first, while looking for vids, I found this one. Dude, tell me this is not fucking Kenny Powers driving this car??? Voice is spot on. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o)

In response to your question, where to begin?

In light of what's going in MO? Everything. What a fucking dumbass. Do you really think it's wise for a cop to write, "...here is the bottom line: if you don't want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you,"? Considering everything that's going on down there and the hostility between police and civilians and the underlying racial tension, do you really believe this was an appropriate time to make these kinds of comments?

Outside of the poor timing, there's many other reasons what he said is wrong.

From the LAPD's website: "To Protect and to Serve" became the official motto of the Police Academy, and it was kept constantly before the officers in training as the aim and purpose of their profession. I want you to tell me how "Do what I tell you or I'm going to physically hurt you" jives with that motto?

There are of course situations when his statements would make sense. Picking one out of millions of possible situations, if he locates a guy dressed in all black running out of a parking lot after a burglar alarm goes off. Yea, in that case, the guy should probably do exactly as he's told. Or a DV call. It's widely known how dangerous DV calls are for officers. People are already angry and out of control when the police show up. In that situation, I'd expect an officer to more aggressive about asserting his authority with a person who is already irate and unpredictable.

However, there's also situations where the cops make unreasonable and sometimes unlawful demands for which they have no authority or legal backing. You can find a plethora of videos on youtube of cops ordering civilians to stop filming them. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izyC_TaVh8M )That's not a lawful order and you of all people can back me up on that. Unless I'm interfering with an investigation (subjective of course), I have the right to film police when they're on duty. Should I expect then, based on this officers article, that if a cop gives me an unlawful command to stop filming him that I'm going to be physically hurt if I refuse to obey it? Outside of youtube videos Sonya, I've had police order me to stop filming them before, during a friend's DUI stop. I refused. They backed down because they knew they had no grounds to prevent me from doing so.

What about other times when they unlawfully demand ID when they have no reasonable suspicion to believe someone has committed or is about to commit a crime? If I refuse to show ID, should I be worried I'm going to get hurt? How about this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlw4RXD6v0o )? 20 minutes of these cops fucking with this guy and trying to get his ID because he was walking down the street and allegedly "fit a description". The guy obviously knows EXACTLY how reasonable suspicion works. Why did they continue to fuck with him? They point a gun at him and a pull out a taser in a threatening way. And for what? Dude was minding his business walking down the street. This kind of shit just shouldn't fucking happen. If the dude was white and in Granite Bay or Irvine, you know he wouldn't be dealing with this shit. But because he's Mexican (it sounds like), he's getting fucked with for no reason.

In this vid ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytb2OF7U1IU ), cop tries to coerce the guy into answering his questions at a DUI stop. He tells him he HAS to answer them because he came through the checkpoint. You and I both know the driver has zero obligation to answer any questions under any circumstances, but the cops lie and say he does. Cop even goes as far as to say "...when you pull this kind of crap." So now asserting your 5th amendment right not to answer questions to police is "pulling crap"? When did it become a bad thing to stand up an assert the rights that our constitution guarantees you?

Cops are not always right Sonya. You're a really smart guy and it took you years of education and experience to understand the law. Most cops I've met aren't at your level of intelligence and certainly don't have your training. But the author of that article is basically saying that in the moment, the cop is always right and you better do what you're told if you don't want to suffer physical harm and you can file a complaint later. Considering cops do sometimes blatantly lie (it's a felony for you to record me!) and misinform people about what their rights are and do sometimes blatantly misconstrue what questions/commands people are required to answer/obey, I think saying "do what I say or you're going to get hurt" is a slippery fucking slope. It's also generally a poor fucking attitude for someone who's job is SUPPOSED to be protecting and serving his community.

I know this will not change your mind. We've been over this and your overall view about these kinda of things is just fundamentally and irreconcilably different than mine. Based on your previous posts, I'd imagine you're going to take the position that the guy in the 20 min vid should have just cooperated and shown his ID and then he could have been on his way. Because he was uncooperative, they thought he was the guy, blah blah. I disagree entirely. I think if I'm walking down the street minding my own business, I should be left the fuck alone. I don't give a shit if they're looking for someone who "looks like me". That's subjective bullshit and it's not my fucking problem.






You do know that Cops are legally allowed to lie, right? Knowing your rights is your responsibility. If you aren't smart enough to know what requests the police are legally allowed to make, then maybe you aren't smart enough to talk back to the police.

The first video you put up shows the guy willfully staying and talking to the police after they say he is not detained. When they say you are not detained you walk away and you don't stop to talk to them again. If they want to stop you they put handcuffs on you. It's obvious this guy wanted to "prove" he knew his rights. If he kept walking and the cops detained him on video he would be rolling in Six Figure Settlement Money. His dumbass stopped to chat. It wasn't the cops who detained him, he detained himself. This is the number one mistake I see on youtube videos with dorks pretending their rights were violated.

When a cop says STOP, you stop. When a cop says "Excuse me Sir", you do whatever the fuck you please.


The first video I ONLY posted because I swear I'm 99% sure that it's Kenny Powers behind the wheel. You're focusing on the wrong part of that one. In the other 3 vids I linked, the citizen does EVERYTHING right and CLEARLY does know their rights. Yet the cops still force the issue and lie through their teeth.

I think you missed the entire point of my post Rain. I was responding to Sonya, who said he doesn't see anything wrong with what Officer Fuckhead said in his newspaper column. I think there's a whole HELL of a LOT wrong with it because cops are wrong frequently enough in their interactions with civilians that a citizen WHO DOES KNOW THEIR RIGHTS might be compelled to disobey an unlawful command (ie, stop filming me, it's a felony). In that instance, should I as a law abiding, tax paying, constitutional rights knowing, American citizen have to worry that I'm going to be shot, tased, pepper sprayed, struck with a baton, or thrown to the ground if I don't "do what I am ordered to do" when that order is unlawful? No. Wrong. Fuck that.

Last edited by [LoD]Vermithrax; 08/21/14 11:10 AM.



Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425
G
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
Offline
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
G
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425


Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 20 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 36 (0.007s) Memory: 11.6793 MB (Peak: 12.8036 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-27 18:06:17 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS